Philosophy

QUESTION:  “Suppose someone claimed to have a device that destroyed people’s souls, but otherwise had no discernible effect on that person.  How would you evaluate such a claim? Is the claim that people have souls any more plausible?  Why or why not? “

THINGS TO KEEP ON MIND:
 

Evidence of critical thought
Evidence of a complete understanding of the relevant theories and concepts
Grammar, spelling and length 
The answer must be 350 Words.
NO WORK CITED PAGES OR NOTHING.
ITS A FREE WRITING QUESTION SO PLEASE NO PLAIGIARISM
MUST BE AN ANSWER OF YOUR OWN.